McNeil v. Wisconsin
United States Supreme Court
501 U.S. 171 (1991)
McNeil (defendant) was arrested for an armed robbery that took place in West Allis. After being read his Miranda warnings, McNeil refused to answer any questions, though he did not ask for an attorney. Being represented by an attorney from the public defender’s office, McNeil was brought before a county clerk commissioner where bail was set and a preliminary examination was scheduled. While McNeil was still in jail, a detective came to question him about a murder, attempted murder and armed burglary that occurred in Caledonia and in which McNeil was a suspect. The detective came on three different occasions. Each time he read McNeil his Miranda warnings and each time McNeil waived them. McNeil eventually implicated himself in the Caledonia crimes.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.