Melenky v. Melen
New York Court of Appeals
134 N.E. 822 (1922)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Reuben Melenky (defendant) conveyed property by deed to his son, Asher Melen (defendant). The deed was accompanied by an oral promise from Melen to reconvey the property to Melenky upon request. Subsequently, Melenky married the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed that she married Melenky in reliance on his statement that he owned the property in which Melen was living. Melenky asked Melen to reconvey the property. Melen deeded a life estate to Melenky but refused to deed the fee. Melenky accepted the deed and despite its availability did not seek to enforce his chose in action. The plaintiff brought suit seeking enforcement of an inchoate right of dower in the property. The trial court found in favor of Melen. The appellate court reversed. Melen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
