Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

190 F. Supp. 3d 843 (2016)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Drug Enforcement Administration

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
190 F. Supp. 3d 843 (2016)

Facts

Section 7606 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 created an exception to the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) by permitting an institution of higher learning to grow or cultivate industrial hemp (1) for purposes of agricultural or academic research and (2) if permitted under the laws of the state in which the institution was located. In 2015, The Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin (the tribe) (plaintiff) passed a tribal ordinance legalizing the cultivation of industrial hemp on tribal lands by licensees of the tribe. The tribe entered into an agreement with the College of the Menominee Nation (the college) to research the viability of industrial hemp cultivation and granted a license to the college, which began cultivating industrial hemp. Several months after the tribe enacted the ordinance, federal agents seized and destroyed the tribe’s hemp crop. The tribe filed a declaratory-judgment action asking the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin to declare that the tribe’s cultivation of industrial hemp for research purposes in cooperation with the college was lawful under § 7606. Specifically, the tribe asked the court to declare that, in enacting the hemp ordinance, the tribe had acted as a state within the meaning of § 7606. In the alternative, the tribe asked the court to declare that its cultivation of industrial hemp was allowed under Wisconsin law because Wisconsin’s cannabis laws did not apply to industrial hemp cultivation on tribal land. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) (defendant) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (defendant) filed a motion to dismiss the tribe’s action, and the tribe filed a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Griesbach, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership