Mercado v. Ahmed

974 F.2d 863 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mercado v. Ahmed

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
974 F.2d 863 (1992)

Facts

Brian Mercado (Brian), a minor, was struck by a taxi operated by Salim Ahmed (defendant). Brian’s mother, Lucy Mercado (Mercado) (plaintiff), sued Ahmed and Ahmed’s employer, the Checker Taxi Company, Inc. (Checker) (defendant), claiming that Ahmed and Checker were negligent. Mercado sought to recover damages for injuries that Brian sustained as a result of the accident, including for Brian’s loss of enjoyment of life, as Brian needed to be institutionalized or remain in a structured environment for the rest of Brian’s life. Mercado argued that Brian’s problems arose due to a head injury caused by the accident. Ahmed and Checker argued that Brian’s problems did not result from the accident, relying on evidence that Brian had a host of physical, developmental, and intellectual limitations before the accident occurred. At trial, Mercado wanted to rely on the opinions of an expert economist who calculated that the value of Brian’s loss of enjoyment of life due to the injuries sustained in the accident exceeded $2 million. The expert’s opinion was based on various research studies that examined people’s overall spending habits to avoid risks during lifetimes. The judge disallowed the expert’s opinion because the studies did not involve scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge, and no agreement was made among economists as to how to measure the value of a person’s life. The jury ruled against Ahmed and Checker and awarded Mercado damages for Brian’s medical expenses and pain and suffering. However, the jury awarded no damages for Brian’s loss of enjoyment of life. Mercado motioned for a new trial on damages. The district court denied the motion. Mercado appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coffey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership