Merits Incentives, LLC v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

262 P.3d 720 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Merits Incentives, LLC v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court
262 P.3d 720 (2011)

Facts

Merits Incentives, LLC, and its business partners (plaintiffs) had contracted with Bumble & Bumble, LLC, to distribute Bumble’s salon products. Bumble sued the petitioners for breach of contract. Prior to Bumble’s suit, one of the petitioners had fired an employee. The company later sued the employee, alleging that he had stolen confidential and proprietary information, and the employee was permanently enjoined from distributing any of the stolen information. After filing suit, Bumble’s attorney, John Mowbray, received an anonymous package addressed to Bumble’s counsel that contained a disk of electronic files. These files contained information about the petitioners that was relevant to Bumble’s suit. Mowbray served the petitioners with multiple supplemental pretrial discovery disclosures that included a copy of the disk and identified that an anonymous source had provided it. Mowbray then served the petitioners with a request for discovery that listed the documents and asked for authentication. The petitioners did not object or claim that the information was privileged for eight months. At that point, the petitioners filed a motion to dismiss Bumble’s case with prejudice. Alternatively, the motion sought to prohibit Bumble’s use of the documents contained in the disk and to disqualify Mowbray on the grounds that the information on the disk was misappropriated and privileged. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada (defendant) found that the disk was sent by an unsolicited, anonymous source, held that Mowbray had fulfilled his ethical duties by repeatedly notifying the petitioners of its delivery and contents, and denied the motion for his disqualification.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hardesty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership