Merritt v. Reserve Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
110 Cal. Rptr 511 (1973)
- Written by Kheana Pollard, JD
Facts
Dewey Merritt (plaintiff) was driving a truck owned by Sterling Transit when the truck collided with the rear of a truck owned by Stafford Company (Stafford). Stafford was insured by Reserve Insurance Company (Reserve) (defendant). Merritt brought suit against Stafford for his injuries. Stafford presented the action to Reserve, which refused to cover the amounts in excess of Stafford’s policy coverage and assigned Stafford legal counsel for the defense action. The decision was affirmed on appeal. Merritt was paid only a portion of his personal-injury award, and he filed another suit against Reserve for bad faith. Testimony suggested that the potential liability assigned to Stafford was miscalculated. The jury found in favor of Merritt. The lower court found in favor of Merritt. Reserve appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fleming, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.