Mertz v. Arendt

564 N.W.2d 294 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mertz v. Arendt

North Dakota Supreme Court
564 N.W.2d 294 (1997)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

John Mertz Jr. (plaintiff) claimed that as a teenager his parents verbally gave him their 240-acre farm but never gave him the deed. John Sr. had switched to other work but wanted the farm to stay in the Mertz name after his older children left to work elsewhere. John Sr. evidently thought John Jr. would receive a tax deed by paying the property taxes. John Jr. paid the taxes and farmed the land without paying rent for 40 years. He insured the property listing himself as the owner and took all the farm products and proceeds, including government farm-assistance payments. John Jr. continued farming the land even after marrying and moving to live with his wife, and he made improvements such as building a dam. After John Jr.’s mother died, his father moved to a nursing home, and John Jr. fenced the farmhouse into a pasture. John Sr. and his daughter certified in Social Security and medical-assistance documents that John Sr. no longer owned the land and received no rental income from it. When John Sr. passed away, nobody had updated the title in almost 70 years. The personal representative of John Sr.’s estate took the land back and leased it to someone else. John Jr. brought an action to quiet title against his siblings, the representative, and the tenant (defendants). The trial court quieted title in John Jr., reasoning that the Mertzes gave him the land, and that he made permanent valuable improvements in reliance. The representative, siblings, and tenant appealed, arguing the statute of frauds invalidated the verbal gift.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (VandeWalle, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership