Metcoff v. Lebovics

977 A.2d 285 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Metcoff v. Lebovics

Connecticut Superior Court
977 A.2d 285 (2007)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Jerrold Metcoff and David Wilson (the creditors) (plaintiffs) were the major stockholders of Midcore Software, Inc. (MS). NCT Group, Inc. (NCT) and related entity NCT Midcore, Inc. (Midcore) entered a merger agreement with MS under which Midcore and MS would merge and Midcore would be the surviving entity. As part of the merger, the creditors were to receive royalties and shares of NCT stock. Irene Lebovics and five other individuals were officers or directors of NCT (together, the directors) (defendants). In 2006, the creditors sued the directors, alleging breach of fiduciary duties, which, in turn, allegedly violated the state’s unfair-trade-practices act. According to the 256-paragraph complaint, NCT and Midcore breached the merger agreement, NCT became insolvent, and the creditors did not receive what they were entitled to, such as shares of stock. The creditors essentially sought to recover what they were entitled to under the agreement, but NCT and Midcore were not named defendants in the suit. The complaint also included a myriad of allegations relating to corporate harm without explicitly seeking to rectify the harm. For example, the creditors asserted that the directors engaged in various acts of misconduct, such as receiving excessive compensation and engaging in self-dealing, which, presumably, had harmed the corporation. The creditors did not make a pre-suit demand on the directors to see whether NCT would pursue the action but argued that such a demand would have been futile. The directors filed a motion to strike the complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership