Miami Herald v. Tornillo
United States Supreme Court
418 U.S. 241 (1974)
Pat Tornillo (plaintiff) was a candidate for the Florida House of Representatives seat of Dade County, Florida. Miami Herald (defendant) was a newspaper that printed two editorials criticizing Tornillo’s candidacy. Tornillo demanded that the Miami Herald publish his responses to the editorials. The newspaper refused and Tornillo brought suit in Florida state court under a Florida statute that granted political candidates criticized by a newspaper the right to have their responses to the criticisms published. The Miami Herald argued that this statute was a violation of the First Amendment’s protection of the freedom of press. The trial court ruled that the statute was unconstitutional, but the Florida Supreme Court reversed. The Miami Herald appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.