Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service v. Babin

18 F.3d 337 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service v. Babin

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
18 F.3d 337 (1994)

Facts

Florence Hammonds (defendant) was a real estate agent at Century 21 Realty. As a real estate agent, Hammonds earned commissions by facilitating the sales of other peoples’ properties. Hammonds herself owned two properties: one was her principal place of residence, and the other was located at 24 Mile Road. A state agency was interested in leasing the 24 Mile Road property as a group home for mentally disabled adults. Instead of leasing to the state agency, Hammonds sold the 24 Mile Road property to Nosh Ivanovic. Hammonds used closing documents bearing the Century 21 logo, but Century 21 did not receive a commission from the sale. Further, in Hammonds’s capacity as an owner, the 24 Mile Road property was the only sale Hammonds made within a 24-month period. Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Inc. (MPAS) (plaintiff), a disability-rights organization, brought suit against Hammonds, contending that the sale of the 24 Mile Road property to Ivanovic violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Hammonds. MPAS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership