From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Microsoft Corp. v. Baker
United States Supreme Court
137 S. Ct. 1702 (2017)
Seth Baker (plaintiff) filed a class action suit against Microsoft Corporation (defendant), alleging that Microsoft’s Xbox videogame console destroyed game discs. The district court denied class certification. Unable to appeal the denial due to the final judgment rule, Baker stipulated to voluntary dismissal of his case with prejudice. Baker then appealed the judgment, but only with respect to the class certification denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether federal courts have jurisdiction to hear appeals under Baker’s voluntary-dismissal tactic.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.