Mid-State Equipment Co., Inc. v. Bell
Supreme Court of Virginia
225 S.E.2d 877 (1976)
In 1945, James and Mary Eubank purchased 85 acres of land. They divided this land into several different plots. In doing so, they put conditions on these plots, one of which was that the plots were to be used for residential purposes only. In 1966, one of these plots was conveyed to James Hicks. In 1973, Hicks conveyed the land to Mid-State Equipment Co., Inc. (Mid-State) (defendant). The deed to Mid-State explicitly stated that the land would not be subject to the conditions placed by the Eubanks. Mid-State then began to use the property for its solid waste equipment business. Mid-State’s neighbors (Bell) (plaintiff) then brought an action for an injunction to prohibit Mid-State from using its land for commercial purposes.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)
Dissent (Cochran, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.