Middendorf v. Henry
United States Supreme Court
425 U.S. 25 (1976)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
A group of enlisted marines (the marines) (plaintiffs) faced trials by summary court-martial for charges including unauthorized absences. The marines filed a class-action lawsuit in federal district court arguing that the military had violated their constitutional rights by refusing to provide them with counsel during summary court-martial proceedings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.