From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Middletown Concrete Products, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
802 F. Supp. 1135 (1992)
Middletown Concrete Products, Inc. (MCP) (plaintiff) and Black Clawson Co. (BCC) (defendant) negotiated the purchase of a machinery system for the manufacture of concrete pipe. During negotiations, the system’s production rates and BCC’s guarantee of such rates became an issue. MCP asked BCC to state what production rates BCC would guarantee. At a subsequent meeting, BCC presented MCP with its definition of acceptable performance of the system (Acceptable Performance Letter). The Acceptable Performance Letter contained a specific production rate. At trial, MCP stated that a representative of BCC told MCP that BCC would guarantee the production rate listed in the Acceptable Performance Letter. When all negotiations had ended, the parties had signed a series of three contracts for the various purchases that made up the machinery system. Each of the three contracts contained a 90 day defect warranty and a warranty limitation that stated: “THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES (WHETHER WRITTEN, ORAL OR IMPLIED).” In addition, each of the contracts contained a merger clause that stated that the contract “contains the entire agreement between Buyer and Seller,” and that “There are no rights, warranties or conditions, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, other than those herein contained.” After receiving the systems, MCP had various problems with the systems and BCC did not repair the problems to MCP’s satisfaction. MCP brought suit and filed a motion for summary judgment based in part on the production rate in the Acceptable Performance Letter.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.