Miener v. Missouri

800 F.2d 749 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Miener v. Missouri

United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit
800 F.2d 749 (1986)

Facts

Terri Ann Miener (plaintiff) was disabled with learning and behavioral disorders as a result of a brain tumor and related surgeries. The Special School District of St. Louis (the district) evaluated Terri and determined that she was disabled but failed to provide any educational services for her whatsoever. Terri’s father lacked the financial means to provide any other educational placement for her and was therefore forced to have her admitted as a full-time resident in a state mental hospital. Terri eventually sued the state of Missouri (defendant) for violations of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), alleging that the state had failed to provide her with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required by the statute, among other claims. Terri sought compensatory educational services for the three-year period during which she was institutionalized. Following a series of judicial proceedings, the issue of whether such claims were recoverable under the EHA came before a court of appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership