Milanovich v. Costa Crociere, S.p.A.

954 F.2d 763 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Milanovich v. Costa Crociere, S.p.A.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
954 F.2d 763 (1992)

Facts

District of Columbia residents Gregory Milanovich and Marjorie Koch-Milanovich (plaintiffs) sued Italian cruise line Costa Crociere, S.p.A. and New York corporation Costa Cruises, Inc. (Costa Cruises) (defendants) to recover for personal injuries Milanovich suffered during a week-long Caribbean cruise when the deck chair Milanovich was occupying collapsed. The Milanoviches filed suit in District of Columbia district court one year and 53 days after the incident occurred, and Costa Cruises promptly moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the Milanoviches were barred from filing suit by a provision of their passage ticket that set a one-year time limit on personal-injury actions, beginning on the date the injury was incurred. The Milanoviches opposed summary judgment on the grounds that the passage ticket also included a choice-of-law clause that imposed Italian law over the ticket, and Italian law prohibited certain liability-limiting provisions in adhesion contracts unless the non-drafting party provided written consent to the provisions. Both the Milanoviches and Costa Cruises assumed that American contract principles controlled the analysis of the issues. The district court granted Costa Cruises’ motion for summary judgment, applied United States law because of the preponderance of United States contacts to the case, and ruled that the Milanoviches’ claim was time-barred by the contractual provision limiting personal-injury claims to one year after the injury. The Milanoviches appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership