Minjak Co. v. Randolph
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
528 N.Y.S.2d 554 (1988)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Randolph and Kikuchi (defendants) rented a loft in Manhattan from Minjak (plaintiff). During their time in the loft, they experienced, among other problems, severe water leaks, sand seeping through cracks and into their loft because of sandblasting, and significant clouds of dust coming into the loft as a result of Minjak’s construction in the building. These intrusions got into and caused damage to their clothes, bed, and food. In addition, Kikuchi had used part of the loft as a music studio, but because of the sandblasting and dust, he was forced to keep the equipment covered and could no longer use the studio. Minjak did nothing to minimize the intrusions after repeated requests. Randolph and Kikuchi started to suffer from eye, throat, and sinus problems as a result. In light of Kikuchi's inability to use the large music studio, Randolph and Kikuchi started paying only one-third of the rent. Minjak brought this action to recover the rent. The trial court found in favor of Randolph and Kikuchi, awarding them rent abatement and punitive damages. The appellate court reversed. Randolph and Kikuchi appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum decision)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.