Minjak Co. v. Randolph

528 N.Y.S.2d 554 (1988)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Minjak Co. v. Randolph

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
528 N.Y.S.2d 554 (1988)

SC
Play video

Facts

Randolph and Kikuchi (defendants) rented a loft in Manhattan from Minjak (plaintiff). During their time in the loft, they experienced, among other problems, severe water leaks, sand seeping through cracks and into their loft because of sandblasting, and significant clouds of dust coming into the loft as a result of Minjak’s construction in the building. These intrusions got into and caused damage to their clothes, bed, and food. In addition, Kikuchi had used part of the loft as a music studio, but because of the sandblasting and dust, he was forced to keep the equipment covered and could no longer use the studio. Minjak did nothing to minimize the intrusions after repeated requests. Randolph and Kikuchi started to suffer from eye, throat, and sinus problems as a result. In light of Kikuchi's inability to use the large music studio, Randolph and Kikuchi started paying only one-third of the rent. Minjak brought this action to recover the rent. The trial court found in favor of Randolph and Kikuchi, awarding them rent abatement and punitive damages. The appellate court reversed. Randolph and Kikuchi appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum Decision)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership