United States Supreme Court
565 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 617 (2012)
Richard Lee Pollard (plaintiff) was a prisoner at a federal institution that was operated by Wackenhunt Corrections Corporation, a private company. In 2002, Pollard filed suit against Minneci and other Wackenhunt employees (defendants) in federal court, claiming cruel and unusual punishment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Pollard sought damages for pain and injuries he allegedly suffered due to inadequate medical care after he slipped and fell in the prison. The district court held that no Eighth Amendment claim exists against employees of a private company that operates a federal prison. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held the cause of action was proper and reversed the district court ruling. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari due to conflicting decisions among courts of appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Ginsberg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.