Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Mishara Construction Co. v. Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
310 N.E.2d 363 (1974)


Facts

Mishara Construction Company, Inc. (Mishara) (plaintiff) was the general contractor for the construction of a housing project. In September 1966, Mishara entered a contract with Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp. (Transit) (defendant), under which Transit agreed to supply Mishara with all its concrete for the project. Transit was to make delivery upon request by Mishara. The parties performed under the contract until April 1967, when a labor dispute resulted in the formation of a picket line at the site of the project. The picket line remained until the project was completed in 1969. Throughout the period of the labor dispute, Mishara placed several orders of concrete. Transit made no deliveries during this time. Mishara ultimately purchased concrete from another supplier and sued Transit for damages. The trial court ruled in favor of Transit. Mishara appealed, taking exception to the inclusion of evidence regarding the delivery difficulties caused by the picket lines, and the trial judge’s failure to instruct the jury that Transit was required to deliver concrete regardless of the picket lines or labor difficulties.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Reardon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.