Mishkin v. New York
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 502 (1966)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Mishkin (defendant) was convicted of violating a New York criminal obscenity law for publishing, hiring others to prepare, and publishing with intent to sell obscene books. Mishkin appealed the conviction, arguing that because the books did not appeal to a prurient interest of the average person in sex and did not stimulate the erotic but instead disgusted and sickened, they did not meet the prurient-appeal requirement of the Supreme Court’s definition of obscenity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.