Mission Independent School District v. Diserens

144 Tex. 107 (1945)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mission Independent School District v. Diserens

Texas Supreme Court
144 Tex. 107 (1945)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Ethel Diserens (defendant) was an extraordinarily talented music teacher. She entered into a contract with the Mission Independent School District (Mission) (plaintiff) to teach music in Mission’s public schools for one year. The contract additionally restricted Diserens from teaching in any other school district in Texas during the same period. On her first day of work, Diserens asked to be released from her contract. Mission refused. Diserens quit and went to work for another school district in Texas. Mission sued Diserens, seeking to enjoin her from working in the other school district. The trial court held that Mission had not been injured by Diserens’s breach, and for that reason rejected Mission’s request for an injunction. Mission appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed. Mission appealed again.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership