Mogul Steamship co. v. McGregor, Gow & Co.
House of Lords
23 Q.B.D. 598 (1889), affirmed [1892] A.C. 25
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
McGregor, Gow & Co. (McGregor) (defendant) represented a group of ship merchants engaged in the Chinese tea trade. Mogul Steamship (Mogul) (plaintiff) was also a ship merchant engaged in the tea trade. All the McGregor ships formed an agreement with each other to drastically undercut the price of tea for the purpose of driving away all other competitors, including Mogul. Additionally, the McGregor group offered a five percent rebate to all local shippers and agents who agreed to exclusively deal with them. Mogul brought suit against McGregor for unfair competition. The lower court held for McGregor, and Mogul appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bowen, L.J.)
Dissent (Lord Esher, M.R.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.