Logourl black

Molasky Enterprises, Inc. v. Carps, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District
615 S.W.2d 83 (1981)


Facts

Carps, Inc. (Carps) (defendant) was a small corporation. Carps directors Herbert and Emile Carp owed money to Carps and applied for a personal loan from Lindell Trust bank to pay the debt before Carps’ yearly financial statement was released. Molasky personally guaranteed the note and then assigned it to Molasky Enterprises, Inc. (Molasky) (plaintiff). Herbert signed the note as president of Carps, making Carps a guarantor. According to the record below, Herbert and Emile were given the “blessing” of their uncles, who were also directors of Carps. Two of the directors were not told about the note, and the Board took no action to approve Herbert’s act. Herbert and Emile defaulted. Molasky paid the note and sued Carps. The trial court found in favor of Carps, and Molasky appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Weier, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.