Mooney v. York Iron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
46 N.W. 376 (1890)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
York Iron Company (York) (defendant) hired Mooney (plaintiff) to sink a mining shaft. Mooney had partially performed the task when York asked him to stop. Mooney sued York, seeking compensation for the work he had performed up until the point when he was told to stop. The jury returned a verdict in Mooney’s favor. York appealed, arguing that damages were inappropriate because the work performed was no longer of any value to it.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cahill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.