Moore v. Elite Metal Performance, LLC

2017 WL 5642349 (2017)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Moore v. Elite Metal Performance, LLC

United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
2017 WL 5642349 (2017)

Facts

On June 9, 2015, D’Jaris Moore (plaintiff) was driving in Jasper County, South Carolina, when he suffered an automobile accident after a tow dolly on another vehicle—a tow truck being driven by Robert Murphy—detached and struck his own vehicle. Murphy was a Florida resident, and the dealer who bought the tow dolly and sold it to Murphy operated only in Florida. Moore brought suit against three parties, including Elite Metal Performance, LLC (Elite) (defendant) as the manufacturer of the tow dolly. Elite’s sole business location was in North Carolina, and Elite designed, built, and sold the tow dolly in North Carolina. Among other things, Moore alleged a breach-of-warranty claim. Moore settled with two of the parties, but Elite moved for summary judgment. Although the parties agreed that the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applied to their case, they disagreed about which state’s version of the UCC applied. Moore insisted that South Carolina’s version applied, but Elite insisted that either North Carolina’s or Florida’s version—both of which were identical for purposes of this case—applied. Elite moved for summary judgment on the breach-of-warranty claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gergel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership