Moore v. Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
89 F.3d 791 (1996)
- Written by Kheana Pollard, JD
Facts
In 1983, Gladys Moore (plaintiff) entered into negotiations with TRW, Inc. (TRW) to allow TRW to drill several wells on Moore’s property. At negotiations, TRW and Moore orally agreed that TRW would drill no more than six wells, the wells would be placed in areas agreed upon on a map, and TRW would not drill in a large field on the property. At a later date, TRW met with Moore to finalize the written contract. Moore reviewed the contract and proposed revisions. TRW and Moore agreed on proposed amendments and executed the written contract. None of the earlier oral provisions were included in the written contract. In 1990, TRW assigned their rights to Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corporation (Pennsylvania Castle) (defendant). Pennsylvania Castle reached out to Moore to negotiate additional drill sites, but Moore refused. Pennsylvania Castle proceeded to begin construction in the field on Moore’s property anyway. Moore filed suit against Pennsylvania Castle for breach of oral contract and trespassing. The lower court found in favor of Moore, and Pennsylvania Castle appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.