Moore v. Regents of the University of California

215 Cal. App. 3d 709 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Moore v. Regents of the University of California

California Court of Appeal
215 Cal. App. 3d 709 (1988)

Facts

John Moore (plaintiff) received treatment at the Medical Center of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) (defendant) for hairy-cell leukemia. As part of the treatment, Moore’s spleen was removed. Without Moore’s knowledge or consent, UCLA doctors developed a cell line from his cells, which was patented for use in pharmaceutical products. These products were valued at three billion dollars. For seven years after removing his spleen, UCLA staff took tissue samples from Moore without informing him. Moore filed suit, alleging conversion of his bodily tissue, and sought damages for lost profits. The trial court dismissed his suit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rothman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership