Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo

298 U.S. 587 (1936)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo

United States Supreme Court
298 U.S. 587 (1936)

Play video

Facts

Joseph Tipaldo (defendant) managed a laundry in New York City and was charged with violating a state statute that established a minimum wage for women employees. Tipaldo was sent to jail to await trial, and he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in New York state court. He claimed, among other things, that the minimum-wage statute violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Tipaldo asserted that New York’s statute was identical to the Washington, D.C., minimum-wage statute held to be unconstitutional in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923). The trial court dismissed Tipaldo’s petition, but the New York Court of Appeals reversed and held that the statute was unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)

Dissent (Stone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership