Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,300+ case briefs...

Morgan County Feeders, Inc. v. McCormick

Colorado Court of Appeals
836 P.2d 1051 (1992)


Facts

Neil Allen owned fifty-six head of cattle that he used principally for recreational cattle drives, though he sometimes leased the cattle to others. Morgan County Feeders, Inc. (Morgan) (plaintiff) held a perfected security interest in the cattle. Allen sold the cattle to James McCormick. Morgan took possession before the cattle could be delivered. Morgan sued, and the trial court ruled in its favor based on the finding that the cattle were “equipment” rather than “inventory.” McCormick appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rothenberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 255,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,300 briefs, keyed to 191 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.