Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye
Canada Supreme Court
[1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077 (1990)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Douglas De Savoye (defendant) previously resided in the Canadian province of Alberta and was the mortgagor of property located in Alberta. After De Savoye moved to British Columbia, another Canadian province, the mortgages went into default. The mortgagees of the property, Morguard Investments Limited (Morguard) (plaintiff) and Credit Foncier Trust Company (CFTC) (plaintiff), commenced foreclosure actions in Alberta. No dispute existed that the Alberta court had jurisdiction over the foreclosure actions. The Alberta court directed, and Morguard and CFTC properly effectuated, service of process on De Savoye in British Columbia. De Savoye failed to appear in the Alberta foreclosure actions. The Alberta court issued judgments against De Savoye. Morguard and CFTC commenced judgment-enforcement actions against De Savoye in British Columbia. The British Columbia ruled in favor of Morguard and CFTC. De Savoye appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (La Forest, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.