Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Morris v. Ulbright

Missouri Supreme Court
558 S.W.2d 660 (1977)


Lina and Frank Ulbright deeded property to Logan Ulbright “and his bodily heirs,” thereby creating an estate tail. The property was eventually transferred to Dorothy and Ralph Ulbright (defendants). Logan Ulbright’s only son was Logan Ulbright, Jr., who was adopted by Marion and Ruby Morris. Logan Ulbright, Jr. changed his name to Logan Morris (Morris) (plaintiff). Morris filed a quiet-title action seeking title to the property. Dorothy and Ralph argued that Morris’s adoption removed him from the bloodline of his natural father, Logan Ulbright, and thus removed him from the fee tail. The trial court granted Dorothy and Ralph summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed. The case was transferred to the Missouri Supreme Court.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Donnelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 508,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 508,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial