Morrison v. Thoelke
District Court of Appeal of Florida
155 So. 2d 889 (1963)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Charles and Yvonne Morrison (defendants) executed a contract to buy land from A.H. and Mattie Thoelke (plaintiffs) and mailed the contract to the Thoelkes. In turn, the Thoelkes executed the contract and mailed it back to the Morrisons. However, before the Morrisons received the executed contract, the Thoelkes called the Morrisons and repudiated their execution of the contract. Nonetheless, the Morrisons recorded the contract when they received it. The Thoelkes brought suit to quiet title and the Morrisons counter-claimed, seeking specific performance of the contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the Thoelkes on the basis of a finding that due to the Thoelkes’ repudiation, a contract had not been formed. The Morrisons appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Allen, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.