Muggli Dental Studio v. Taylor

419 N.W.2d 322, 142 Wis. 2d 696 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Muggli Dental Studio v. Taylor

Wisconsin Court of Appeals
419 N.W.2d 322, 142 Wis. 2d 696 (1987)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

In trial court, a judgment was entered in favor of Muggli Dental Studio (Muggli) (plaintiff) against Dr. Ted Taylor (defendant). An execution was issued against Taylor’s personal property, and the sheriff levied against the property. The levy occurred on December 9, 1986. In 1982 the Citizens Lakeshore Bank had obtained a security interest in Taylor’s personal property due to a financing statement filed at that time. Prior to the levy, Taylor’s father (Taylor Sr.) paid this bank debt for Taylor. Taylor Sr. did not have the collateral in his possession. Taylor Sr.’s financing statement was filed on January 2, 1987. After the trial court’s judgment, Taylor asserted that the lien created in Muggli’s favor by the levy did not have priority over the security interest held by Taylor Sr. In a postjudgment proceeding, the trial court ruled against Taylor. Taylor appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nettesheim, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership