Muhammad v. County Bank
New Jersey Supreme Court
912 A.2d 88 (2006)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Jaliyah Muhammad (plaintiff) borrowed $200 from County Bank (defendant) on May 23, 2003, as a short-term, single advance. Muhammad agreed to repay the advance plus a finance charge of $60 by June 13, 2003. The annual percentage rate of the loan was 608.33 percent. Muhammad extended the loan twice, incurring a new $60 finance charge each time. As part of the loan and extensions, Muhammad signed contracts with County Bank. The contracts required the arbitration of any disputes, barred class claims in arbitration, and prohibited class action suits in court. Muhammad filed a putative class-action suit against County Bank in February 2004, alleging that County Bank was charging an illegal interest rate. The trial court stayed the case, pending arbitration. Muhammad appealed to the New Jersey Court of Appeals, which affirmed. Muhammad then appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (LaVecchia, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Rivera-Soto, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.