Muir v. Commissioner

11 F. App’x 701 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Muir v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
11 F. App’x 701 (2001)

Facts

Ross Muir (plaintiff) was a partner in a limited partnership. Muir timely filed tax returns for the years 1980 and 1981 and included losses attributable to his investment in the partnership. In 1984 and 1985, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) sent Muir Forms 872-A seeking his consent to extend the limitation period to assess deficiencies for the 1980 and 1981 tax years. The language of the forms provided that the consent could be terminated by either Muir or the IRS by executing a Form 872-T notice of termination. The forms lacked language indicating that the consent would expire on a certain date. In 1988, the IRS issued Muir a notice of deficiency denying his claimed losses for the 1980 and 1981 tax years. Muir challenged the assessment in the United States Tax Court, arguing that too much time had passed after filing his returns for the IRS to issue a notice of deficiency for those years. The IRS denied Muir’s petition, and Muir appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership