Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board
361 N.L.R.B. 72 (2014)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Employer Murphy Oil USA, Inc. (defendant) required all job applicants and employees to sign an arbitration agreement. The agreement required individual arbitration of any employment-related dispute, waiving the right to either class arbitration or collective or class-action lawsuits. Three employees filed a collective lawsuit alleging the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay for overtime and off-the-clock work-related activities. The district court compelled arbitration under the agreement. Meanwhile, one of the employees filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), claiming the arbitration agreement unlawfully restricted employees’ right to engage in protected concerted activities and would lead employees to believe they could not file unfair-labor-practice charges. The company revised the agreement to clarify that it did not preclude unfair-labor-practice charges but reserved the right to enforce the waiver under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). General counsel for the NLRB filed a revised complaint reiterating that the agreement violated the FLSA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
Dissent (Johnson, Member)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.