Nash v. Kornblum

12 N.Y.2d 42 (1962)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nash v. Kornblum

New York Court of Appeals
12 N.Y.2d 42 (1962)

JL

Facts

Kornblum (defendant) conducted a summer camp and needed fencing put in around three tennis courts. Kornblum contacted Nash (plaintiff), who operated a fence-building company, for an estimate. The sales employee measured the area and determined that Kornblum needed 484 linear feet of fencing. By phone, Nash quoted Kornblum a price of $2,040 for 10-foot-tall chain-link fencing. Kornblum asked whether there was anything available for a lower price, and Nash mentioned that hex netting would cost less. Kornblum requested written estimates. The sales employee wrote out the estimates and gave them to a stenographer. The hex-netting estimate stated that the price for 968 linear feet with two widths of five each was $1,829. This was intended to represent that amount of fencing required to construct 484 linear feet of fence, but the estimate did not specifically say that. Kornblum accepted the hex-netting estimate, and after the fencing was installed, claimed that Nash had agreed to provide 968 feet of 10-foot-tall fencing for that price. Because some additional fencing had been added, the parties disagreed over the amount owed by Kornblum. Nash sued Kornblum to recover the additional amount and sought reformation of the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foster, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership