National Broadcasting Co v. Bear Stearns & Co.

165 F. 3d 184 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Broadcasting Co v. Bear Stearns & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
165 F. 3d 184 (1999)

Facts

National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and NBC Europe, Inc. (collectively, NBC) (defendant) were summoned by Mexican television station TV Azteca S.A. de C.V. (Azteca) (plaintiff) to commercial arbitration proceedings in Mexico. The Mexican proceedings were conducted by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), a private French organization. As part of the arbitration process, NBC issued subpoenas to Bear Stearns and Co., Inc.; Merrill Lynch and Company; Salomon Brothers, Inc.; SBC Warburg, Inc.; and Violy Byorum and Partners (collectively, Azteca’s financial partners) (plaintiffs). Azteca’s financial partners were not parties to the arbitration. Azteca and Azteca’s financial partners filed a motion to quash the subpoenas in federal district court. NBC filed a cross-motion to enforce the subpoenas under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, which authorized United States courts to order the production of evidence for use in proceedings in a “foreign or international tribunal.” The district court granted the motion to quash and denied the motion to enforce. The district court reviewed the language, legislative history, and purpose of § 1782 and found that private commercial arbitration conducted by a nongovernment entity such as the ICC did not qualify as a foreign or international tribunal as required by § 1782. NBC appealed, arguing that although Azteca’s financial partners were not parties to the arbitration, enforcement of subpoenas against them was justified under § 1782 because the ICC arbitration panel qualified as a foreign or international tribunal under that provision. In support of its position, NBC provided evidence of various references to arbitration panels as tribunals or arbitration tribunals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership