Newberry v. Barth, Inc.
Iowa Supreme Court
252 N.W.2d 711 (1977)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Florence Barth and her husband owned an apartment complex. The Barths formed Barth, Inc. (defendant) to purchase the complex with a loan from the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Under the terms of the loan agreement, Barth, Inc. could not sell the complex without FHA approval. Florence was named a Barth, Inc. officer and apartment manager. Subsequently, Florence signed a contract to sell the complex to Donald Newberry (plaintiff). Florence did not tell Newberry that Barth, Inc. owned the complex, or that FHA approval was needed for any sale. Newberry brought suit seeking specific performance of the sales contract on the ground that Florence was acting as Barth, Inc.’s agent. The trial court found in favor of Newberry. Barth, Inc. appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reynoldson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.