Newman v. L & H Co.
Virginia Circuit Court
86 Va. Cir. 48 (2012)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Jared and Kathryn Newman (plaintiffs) rented a house from L & H Company (L&H) (defendant). The Newmans signed a lease that contained an indemnity clause. The indemnity clause stated that if the Newmans’ personal property was damaged by L&H, the Newmans were required to reimburse L&H for any compensation that the Newmans received from L&H. Unbeknownst to the Newmans, L&H had placed flammable material in the fireplace. The Newmans built a fire in the fireplace, and the house caught on fire. The fire damaged the Newmans’ personal property. Subsequently, the Newmans filed suit against L&H, seeking to receive compensation for the damage to their personal property. L&H filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court took the motion under advisement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Doherty, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.