Newsome v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

153 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 10 (1910)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Newsome v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

North Carolina Supreme Court
153 N.C. 153, 69 S.E. 10 (1910)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

T.J. Newsome (plaintiff) sent a telegraph ordering expedited delivery of four gallons of whisky for his raft hands working in a dry county. According to Newsome, the workers agreed to construct rafts to transport Newsome’s timber and rosin to Wilmington, North Carolina, during a heavy river flow only if he provided whisky. Newsome said he told the telegraph operator he needed the whisky to get his rafting work done, but the operator transcribed his signature as T.J. Sessons instead of Newsome on the telegram, and the whisky never arrived. Newsome’s crew refused to get in the water without it, so Newsome lost the opportunity created by the heavy river flow. Newsome sued Western Union Telegraph Company (defendant) for the lost profits resulting from the errant telegram. The trial court determined that the damages requested were too speculative and refused to award them. Newsome appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership