Newton Tractor Sales, Inc. v. Kubota Tractor Corp.
Illinois Supreme Court
906 N.E.2d 520 (2009)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Newton Tractor Sales, Inc. (Newton) (plaintiff) contracted to buy VTE, a dealership authorized to sell equipment manufactured by Kubota Tractor Corp. (Kubota) (defendant). Michael Jacobson (defendant), a Kubota representative, told Newton and VTE that Newton could not become an authorized Kubota dealer until Kubota had terminated VTE’s authorization. Nevertheless, Jacobson promised Newton and VTE that there would be no issues, and that Kubota would authorize Newton once this occurred. Relying on that promise, VTE terminated its authorization deal with Kubota. Subsequently, Kubota denied Newton’s application to become an authorized Kubota dealer. Newton sued Kubota based on promissory estoppel, among other claims. The circuit court granted Kubota summary judgment, finding that promissory estoppel was not a valid cause of action in Illinois. The appellate court affirmed. Newton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.