Nichols v. United States
United States Supreme Court
511 U.S. 738 (1994)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Nichols (defendant) was convicted of a federal drug-related offense. He had previously been convicted of DUI, a state misdemeanor, and was forced to pay a fine, but was not given any jail time. Nichols was not represented by counsel at the DUI proceeding. The trial court used Nichols’s misdemeanor DUI conviction to enhance his sentence for the drug charge. Nichols appealed, arguing that his DUI conviction could not be used to enhance his sentence because the DUI conviction was uncounseled.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.