Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. Anodyne Therapy, LLC

626 F.3d 958 (2010)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
N
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. Anodyne Therapy, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
626 F.3d 958 (2010)

CS

Facts

Anodyne Therapy, LLC (defendant) was a medical-device manufacturer. Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. (plaintiff) was a home-healthcare provider that purchased infrared lamps from Anodyne for use by Nightingale patients. Following a price dispute with Anodyne, Nightingale brought a Lanham Act suit against Anodyne, alleging that Anodyne’s sales representatives had falsely represented that the lamps had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of a particular illness. The district court found that Nightingale’s Lanham Act claim had no merit and had been brought in an effort to coerce a price reduction from Anodyne. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Anodyne and also granted Anodyne’s request for attorneys’ fees. Nightingale appealed the award of attorneys’ fees, alleging that it was unjustified under the provisions of the Lanham Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Intellectual Property
Trademark

Key Terms