Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fritz Companies, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
210 F.3d 1099 (2000)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hitachi Data Systems Corp. (plaintiff) hired Fritz Companies, Inc. (defendant), to ship a large disk drive from Miami to Argentina. Fritz hired Tower Air Inc. (Tower) (defendant), to transport the disk drive by plane. The disk drive was damaged when it arrived in Argentina. Hitachi brought suit against Fritz and Tower. Under the shipping contracts, to recover for damages incurred during a shipment, the aggrieved party must dispatch a written complaint within seven days. Fritz and Tower each moved for summary judgment, claiming that they did not receive notice of the damage within seven days. Fritz filed an affidavit stating that it did not receive notice within seven days. As to Tower, Hitachi filed an affidavit stating that it had dispatched notice to Tower’s agent, Laser Cargo, S.A. Tower filed an affidavit stating that it did not receive notice within seven days and that Laser Cargo had never served as Tower’s agent. The district court granted Fritz and Tower summary judgment. Hitachi appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.