North Supply Co. v. Greater Development & Services Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
728 F.2d 363 (1984)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
North Supply Co. (North) (plaintiff) entered into an agency contract with Greater Development & Services Corp. (GDSC) (defendant). Even though the deal collapsed, GDSC appeared to still be entitled to the commission under the contract. North sued for reformation in federal district court. GDSC brought arbitration under the contract’s arbitration clause and filed a motion in the district court to stay all proceedings so that arbitration could take place. The court refused on the ground that the courts should handle issues involving reformation. GDSC appealed, but the court of appeals dismissed because there was no injunction that would allow interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). North motioned the district court to issue a stay of the arbitration proceedings until the trial could be completed, which the court also denied. North appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
Dissent (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.