Northern Delaware Industrial Development Corp. v. E.W. Bliss Co.
Delaware Court of Chancery
245 A.2d 431 (1968)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
E.W. Bliss Company (defendant) contracted with the Northern Delaware Industrial Development Corporation and Phoenix Steel Corporation (plaintiffs) to modernize a steel plant. The work progressed more slowly than anticipated, requiring one of Phoenix’s steel mills to be shut down. Phoenix sought a court order to compel Bliss to bring in 300 more workers to make up a second shift, as the contract required. The court refused, finding it inappropriate, if not impossible, to mandate that Bliss keep a specific number of workers on the job at a steel mill undergoing extensive modernization. Phoenix requested reargument, claiming all it sought was an order directing a ministerial act by requiring Bliss to hire more workers, not specific performance of the contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marvel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.