Northern Delaware Industrial Development Corp. v. E.W. Bliss Co.

245 A.2d 431 (1968)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Northern Delaware Industrial Development Corp. v. E.W. Bliss Co.

Delaware Court of Chancery
245 A.2d 431 (1968)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

E.W. Bliss Company (defendant) contracted with the Northern Delaware Industrial Development Corporation and Phoenix Steel Corporation (plaintiffs) to modernize a steel plant. The work progressed more slowly than anticipated, requiring one of Phoenix’s steel mills to be shut down. Phoenix sought a court order to compel Bliss to bring in 300 more workers to make up a second shift, as the contract required. The court refused, finding it inappropriate, if not impossible, to mandate that Bliss keep a specific number of workers on the job at a steel mill undergoing extensive modernization. Phoenix requested reargument, claiming all it sought was an order directing a ministerial act by requiring Bliss to hire more workers, not specific performance of the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marvel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership