Norton v. City of Springfield
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
806 F.3d 411 (2015)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The City of Springfield (defendant) enacted an ordinance prohibiting panhandling. The ordinance prohibited oral requests for immediate donations, but it permitted written signs requesting money and oral statements requesting money to be sent at a later time. The ordinance applied to the city’s downtown historic district, which is less than 2 percent of the city’s area but a large percentage of its economic activity. The ordinance was challenged in the district court, which upheld the ordinance. The judgment was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.