O'Connor v. Resort Custom Builders, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
591 N.W.2d 216 (1999)
A subdivision's covenants restricted the use of subdivision lots to residential purposes. Resort Custom Builders, Inc. (company) (defendant) owned one such lot and built a house for which it could not find a purchaser. The company decided to sell interval-ownership timeshares in the property to multiple purchasers, giving each purchaser the exclusive right to use the house for one or two weeks each year, and a corresponding undivided interest in the property. O'Connor and other lot owners (owners) (plaintiffs) sued the company, contending that the company's plan would violate the subdivision's residential-use covenant. The trial court agreed, but an appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment. The owners appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 684,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 684,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 42,700 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.