Supreme Court of Washington
353 P.2d 672 (Wash. 1960)
Mr. and Mrs. Fred Obde (plaintiffs) purchased an apartment home from Mr. and Mrs. Robert Schlemeyer (defendants). After they moved in, the Obdes found that the apartment was infested with termites. The infestation was not readily apparent on the surface. The Schlemeyers knew about the infestation, but had not disclosed it to the Obdes, purportedly because the Obdes never specifically asked. In fact, prior to selling to the Obdes, the Schlemeyers had attempted to get rid of the termites, but did not follow the exterminator’s recommended course of treatment for financial reasons. Accordingly, the exterminator gave the Schlemeyers no guarantee that the infestation was eradicated. The Obdes brought suit on the contract, seeking damages. The trial court ruled in their favor. The Schlemeyers appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Finley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.